Campus Location

Dallas Campus (Online)

Date of Award

5-2025

Document Type

Dissertation

Department

Organizational Leadership

Degree Name

Doctor of Education

Committee Chair or Primary Advisor

Kristin O'Byrne

Second Committee Member or Secondary Advisor

Stuart Allen

Third Committee Member or Committee Reader

Jenifer Wolf-Williams

Abstract

Sexual harassment (SH) is a prevalent, costly, and often unreported problem in the U.S. Federal Government. Despite decades of research from multiple perspectives and recommendations to address SH, the problem persists and remains complex. While some researchers and U.S. Government agencies have called upon leaders to commit to eliminating workplace SH, others have suggested using an integrated conflict management system (ICMS) to manage the complexity, nuances, and conflicts. Even though there is a call for leadership to address SH, there is limited documentation in the literature about leaders’ experiences and perceptions in addressing the problem. Therefore, this qualitative study was designed to explore leaders’ experiences and perceptions of addressing workplace SH and identify whether organizational approaches used to address workplace SH in the Executive Branch aligned with an ICMS. Using a constructivist paradigm, 90-minute individual interviews were conducted with nine participants, current and former U.S. Federal Government Executive Branch in various senior leadership positions. Conducting semistructured interviews was not intended to evaluate individual leader effectiveness; rather, participants were encouraged to provide candid responses to open-ended questions to elicit leadership experiences and perceptions about organizational approaches such as policies, processes, and practices to inform a systems approach. The key findings indicate that senior leaders recognize the complexity of SH and are frustrated with the barriers and challenges that hinder disclosing, reporting, and addressing workplace SH. Additionally, the findings showed that the organizational approaches used to address workplace SH in the Executive Branch at the of the study were not aligned with an ICMS and instead were heavily focused on mitigating agency liability, which is antithetical to managing the nuances of workplace SH and associated conflicts. The findings suggest that any goal aimed to eliminate workplace SH in the Executive Branch should be shifted to a more realistic and obtainable objective consistent with addressing complex problems such as designing a holistic system that can help leaders manage the complexity of the problem, the nuances, and associated conflicts while simultaneously balancing individual needs and organizational interests.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.