Campus Location

Dallas Campus (Online)

Date of Award

11-2025

ORCID

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2670-6004

Document Type

Dissertation

Department

Organizational Leadership

Degree Name

Doctor of Education

Committee Chair or Primary Advisor

Melinda Carver

Second Committee Member or Secondary Advisor

Christie Bledsoe

Third Committee Member or Committee Reader

John Harrison

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of perceived principal leadership styles and school type on elementary teachers’ self-efficacy. The study examined two research questions. The first examined differences between teachers’ self-efficacy in Title 1 and non-Title 1 schools, and the second examined differences in teacher self-efficacy and perceived principal leadership styles (authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire). The convenience sample included 129 elementary teachers from social media teacher groups that taught in various Title 1 and non-Title 1 school districts. I used a quantitative, causal-comparative method to collect data and survey questionnaires that identified trends in leadership styles within the K–5 grade levels. A Mann- Whitney U test was used to analyze the differences in self-efficacy between Title 1 and non-Title 1 teachers since assumptions 4, 5, and 6 were not met. A Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to establish if there was a statistically significant relationship between principals’ leadership styles and elementary teachers’ self-efficacy. For RQ1, the tests run identified that there was no statistically significant difference between Title 1 and non-Title 1 elementary teachers’ self- efficacy. The study failed to reject the null hypothesis since there was no difference between the groups. The findings for RQ2 revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in elementary teachers’ overall self-efficacy scores among teachers who perceived they reported to principals with different leadership styles, as measured by the principals’ leadership styles survey. The study failed to reject the null hypothesis for RQ2.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.